New Top 20 prospects
View Single Post
08-15-2006, 01:15 PM
Join Date: Feb 2003
Originally Posted by
Even the best experts can be wrong. Many 'experts' had Chouinard in the same ball park as Gagne... did that pan out? Many 'experts' didn't think enough of Andrei Markov to have him go in the first few rounds of his year... were they correct?
If prospects were just ranked according to where they were drafted, these rankings would be pretty stale. I also think there is a trend on these boards to overrate more recently drafted prospects, if only because they have had less of an opportunity to dissapoint.
Everyone is entitiled to their opinion and you could very well be right, but the writer of this article doesn't deserve the kind of backlash he is getting for presenting us ONE informed opinion on the matter. With this kind of reception, he might not want to take the time out of his life to offer us somehthing like this in the future....
Why do a list only based on opinion, and not considering the expert??? Chouinard was a very good propsect, but he was ONLY a prospect... The list should be the market value of our prospects, because it's the real thing...
Maxwell has a better value than Heino-Lindberg, it's a simple fact... I'm so sorry for you...
View Public Profile
Le depisteur's albums
Find More Posts by Le depisteur