Thread: Speculation: Trade Speculation Part VII
View Single Post
04-02-2013, 12:05 PM
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Montreal
Country: Canada
Posts: 19,477
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Rhodes 81 View Post
this is exactly what he said in february, and you called him an idiot for it. that's what his point is. except i'm willing to bet clarkson would have gotten a higher return this time a month ago than he would today.

it doesn't matter though, because lou won't trade clarkson.
At the time, when we actually winning games, it made no sense... you know, cause we were winning games.

Now that we can't win against bottom feaders, it's time to realise that the 2013 campaign isn't ours, so let's start planning for the future.

Why trade away players when we're on a hot streak and the player we want to move is the only one scoring goals? Now that right there didn't make alot of sense but with our "New York Mets" slide in the standings, we wouldn't miss him cause we aren't going anywhere and David is a shadow of his former self.

Would the return be less then if Lou moved him when he was torching the league, maybe... but we were in 1st at the time, now we're in 8th and dropping by the second.

DEVILS ALL THE WAY* is offline