View Single Post
Old
04-02-2013, 03:48 PM
  #70
arsmaster
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 22,493
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by mossey3535 View Post
I disagree with the idea that Higgins signed for less though. Cap is going down by $6M*30 teams - that's $180M just on the ceiling.

Meanwhile, according to capgeek there's $388M of UFA and $282M of RFA coming up in the offseason.

Even if I cut it off at players who make $1M minimum (assuming guys under that salary are 100% bubble and might not even make the NHL anyways) I get $267M and $89M respectively.

Let's say the RFA's don't count and the UFA's are all re-signed at a number proportional to the decrease in the cap ceiling - 64.3/70.2 = 8.5% haircut.

So Higgins would probably make more like $1.74M on the open market going by that.

Not a good time to be a free agent in the next two years.
All that math, you just have to look at what Scottie Upshall, Joel Ward, Sean Bergenheim, Tomas Kopecky all signed for 2-3 years ago when the cap was comparable.

Higgins was already here cheap, and would have gotten paid on the open market, that is how free agency works.

arsmaster is offline   Reply With Quote