View Single Post
Old
04-04-2013, 11:10 AM
  #103
haveandare
Registered User
 
haveandare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: New York
Country: United States
Posts: 9,059
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sad London Ranger View Post
It is a Nash for Gabby trade we should have done last summer without giving up
Dubi, Erixon and Anisimov who are on the whole better and more proven than Dorsett, Brassard and More.


the Jury is still out - one game doesn't a playoff run make.

When we go to the SC semifinals then we can say we improved the team. I am sceptical.
Dubi Erixon and AA are better and more proven than Dorsett, Brassard and Moore? How?

People have some serious selective memory with Dubi. He has 1 goal this year after fighting it so much last year. That's worrying. Dorsett is a downgrade from him, yeah, but it's fairly obvious that Clowe is the Dubi replacement and he's a solid upgrade IMO. Brassard and AA isn't a big difference at all, neither is Erixon and Moore.

Also, the idea was to have Nash and Gabby together. You don't know it doesn't work until you try it.

I'm very happy with the trade the more I think about it. I'll miss the Gabby we saw last year but I'm not confident he'll be that player again.

haveandare is offline   Reply With Quote