View Single Post
Old
04-05-2013, 03:05 AM
  #45
Reinhart
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Country: Azores
Posts: 1,148
vCash: 500
Meh.. Feaster exaggerates, and on the other hand it isn't such a stretch to believe either.

Glencross is very good value, and is the type of player that is very flexible in a lineup. I would bet most (if not all) teams would take him with everything considered.

As for the 'untouchables' - Flames are simply not going to 'burn it to the ground'. They identified who they want to keep in their lineup moving forward to help with the transition. Maybe they feel teams will not value those pieces as much as the Flames do? Perhaps it is just a way to drive up the value before the draft? Who knows...

Brodie, however, should be 'untouchable'. He has been pretty effective given his age. Definitely a keeper. Why would rebuilding teams trade players in their under 22 anyways (except if they are a problem, which Brodie is definitely not). I would put Backlund in there personally as well.

Reinhart is offline   Reply With Quote