Thread: Player Discussion: Derick Brassard
View Single Post
Old
04-08-2013, 01:16 PM
  #229
Bluenote13
Believe In Henke
 
Bluenote13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: BKLYN, NYC
Posts: 23,833
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonathan. View Post
And now is the first time he's been on a relatively functional team. Voracek has turned into a quality player after looking like he was rushed to the NHL his rookie year. Give Brassard a full season to wash the Columbus suck off of him and see if he can be a good player on a contending team. If not? We can move him for some picks. No big loss.

What is the Rangers' agenda of team building? Acquire young depth that can potentially be a solid contributor in the future? I agree with you about team turnover, but the Gaborik move was a fairly solid move both now and for the future.
This Voracek stuff is way overblown now.

Voracek always produced the same amount of points on a bad Columbus team. He is also 3 years younger than Brassard. Voracek has always been considered a very good prospect while in the NHL, just on a bad poorly run franchise.

Bluenote13 is offline