View Single Post
04-09-2013, 10:30 AM
ZARTONK's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Montreal
Country: Armenia
Posts: 9,163
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by jpchabby View Post
Nobody talks about the 1995 trophies as less worthy than any other season, even though it was a shortened season too... I don't get why this year, people would feel the need to specify that it was a shortened season...

If Stamkos wins the Art Ross, no one would say he did it because of the shortened season (except for the Crosby injury, but injuries happen all the time in hockey...). If Lindros was the MVP in 1995, it's because he was the MVP during that season. Period.

I just... don't get it...
I agree, throphies aren't awarded to compare the best players from different seasons, they're given to honour the best player of THAT season.

ZARTONK is offline   Reply With Quote