Thread: Speculation: Burns, future forward for life?
View Single Post
Old
04-13-2013, 10:41 AM
  #29
ChompChomp
SACK T-MAC
 
ChompChomp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Dallas, TX (Ugh)
Country: United States
Posts: 8,934
vCash: 500
I don't know about Burns playing F for life, but I still have this frustrating feeling that the Sharks are not icing the best PP units possible. Even if Burns goes back to D, he seems such a beast up front that you should (at least) consider playing him at F on the PP, right now and going forward.

And I don't get why we still play Pavs on the point for PP unit 1. Seems like we have enough offensive dmen to let Pavs center the second unit.

Marleau-Thornton-Burns
Boyle-Braun

Havlat-Pavs-Couture
Demers-Irwin

I'm sorry, but I just don't get it. Don't get why our PP units don't look something (doesn't have to be exact of course) like this.

ChompChomp is offline   Reply With Quote