View Single Post
Old
04-14-2013, 06:28 PM
  #42
doubledown99
Registered User
 
doubledown99's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,822
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DousedInOil View Post
People had this same argument when we first started drafting high in 2007. Each year it was "we need someone who can step in right away". I don't care how long it takes the player to come into the league. Even if its 4 years and he turns out to be the BPA then that's what I want. Jones Is the BPA and we would be insanely lucky to even have a chance at drafting him.
It's not about stepping in....Jones is good enough to play in the NHL. I'm just coming from the viewpoint that it will likely take him 3 years to be an impact defenseman most likely.

I am coming from the viewpoint that your dmen need to be more mature and experienced than your forwards due the complexity of the position. When I look at how Chicago was constructed their dmen were older and had more experience than their forwards. We don't have that luxury so I'd like them to copy that model through trade.

Yes young dmen can come in and make an impact but its more rare. Doughty did it but he still fights inconsistency. EK took about 3yrs. Pie as well. Heck it even took Pronger several yrs before he became impact player and in fact before his trade to Edm lots of people thought he was to immature to be impact player in playoffs (due to some early flameouts by the Blues and undisciplined penalties from Pronger etc during that time).

Most experts agree that is better to be patient with dmen no matter how talented. Detroit has the philosophy of really seasoning there dmen before they come up.

Again just an opinion and as with all opinions it's up for debate

doubledown99 is offline