View Single Post
04-16-2013, 11:52 AM
Kane One
HFB Partner
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Brooklyn, New NY
Country: United States
Posts: 32,393
vCash: 2000
Originally Posted by SnowblindNYR View Post
Ok, fair point. However, my point remains, it's still "too close to call". Yes literally Bob is having a better season and so is Montreal up to this point. If you want to be literal, which proves nothing really, you got yourself a win.

Edit: For some reductio ad absurdum. If I were to amass a fortune that's 1 dollar greater than Bill Gates', would I be more successful than Bill Gates?
I don't think measure of wealth is equal to the measure of success.

Lundqvist is clearly more successful than Bobrovsky, even if they are tied in Vezina wins after this season. You just said yourself that Bobrovsky is having the better season, so why shouldn't he win? I'm not trying to argue anything else. If the season ended when we started this debate, I'll say that Bobrovsky should win, and that's pretty much it. Us arguing anything else is just ridiculous.

Kane One is online now