View Single Post
Old
04-17-2013, 07:06 PM
  #672
cbcwpg
Registered User
 
cbcwpg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Between the Pipes
Country: United Nations
Posts: 5,686
vCash: 350
Quote:
Originally Posted by Killion View Post
This is entirely separate, absent an anchor tenant MN. This is an invitation to really companies like AEG, Global-Spectrum & others with experience in large facility management. The Glendale RFP includes there-in a requirement that bidders include in their submissions just what they would do to attract an anchor tenant, the assumption being with that point that the Coyotes are already gone. However, in another question & requirement, the RFP asks the bidder to include information as to how they see themselves working with an anchor tenant if one is already installed & therefore pre-existant to their assuming the contract on July 1st, 2013 should they win it. Intelligently, the RFP asks for references pursuant to working with anchor tenants & so on & so forth so the bars been set at a reasonable level and will keep the riff raff from applying.
No riff raft? Well, that definitely would be unique for this mess.

All we have seen for the last four years has been Riff and Raft.

cbcwpg is offline