Thread: Value of: Marc Methot to Edmonton?
View Single Post
Old
04-20-2013, 02:45 PM
  #66
lakai17
Registered User
 
lakai17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,719
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manked View Post
"Nothing is guaranteed".

Tell me how that doesn't apply to every single team in the NHL? Nothing is ever guaranteed that statement is redundant.

The Senators future on Defence is very bright. They have arguably the best Defenceman in the NHL (long term as well, and at least top 3). They have a under 23 D who is already a #3 and should become a good #2. We have another defender who has been by far the best Defenceman this year and at worst is a #3 d-man. We have a defenseman who in my opinion has had the second best rookie season for a D. Then, we have a 19 year old who should be a top 4, but if that doesn't work out we also have a first round pick this year, a grinder in Boro, and the most intriguing prospect of them all Mikael Wikstrand.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prajna View Post
You are missing the point. We practically have a top 4 set for the next decade, even without Ceci. Why did you leave out Karlsson and Cowen. They are the two most important pieces and are both 22. How many more up and coming do you need when you have 2 proven 22 year olds. Most teams 5 or 6 guys will not produce 2 guys like that.
There are also more potentials the Sens have that I left out.
Wikstrand
Claesson
Blood
Wideman
Sdao
I understand building around Lehner and Karlsson you can throw anyone on that defence and win. They get the job done!

lakai17 is online now   Reply With Quote