View Single Post
Old
04-22-2013, 11:43 AM
  #23
RandR
Registered User
 
RandR's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Ottawa
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,222
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CptKirk View Post
Bingo. The NHL is interested in creating a standardized metric based on fairly tight criteria, the teams are interested in using systems that help them evaluate the contributions of their own players. It's not a matter of trust, it's just that teams are going to change the definitions to something that suits their ends better, and count up stats with their revised definitions.
Good points, but I also think that a lack of trust is implied. To me it is like political parties... when they don't like the results of polling data, they too frequently criticize or dismiss the pollsters (or their methodologies) and feel further convinced that they can only trust their own data.

So the upside of doing one's own stats is as you've stated.

The downside is that when measuring things that have a subjective element (in hockey, what constitutes a hit or what constitutes a scoring chance) then an inherent bias of favouring one's own can and will sometimes affect one's own results, especially when looking to confirm previously-held beliefs.

RandR is offline   Reply With Quote