Conference Champions vs Canucks | 04.22.13 | 10 pm EST
View Single Post
04-22-2013, 10:01 PM
Join Date: Jan 2011
Originally Posted by
Anyone defending Seabrook with the season he's had is a joke.
If he didn't have great teammates propping his ass up all the time the stats would definitely bear that out. The complete lack of effort, common sense, and urgency on (usually) numerous plays in a given game is inexcusable for a "#2" defensemen. I cannot believe you are seriously defending him.
If he moves back up to the #1 pairing with Keith it's an indictment of Keith's cluelessness. Giving Hammer and Keith as many minutes as possible gives this team the best chance to win going forward. If you don't find that obvious than you truly are a lost cause.
Zac, everyone understands you need a Dman to hate. If it's not Seabrook, it's Keith. You can give it up now.
I repeat: Anyone denying Seabrook as an outstanding NHL Dman is a joke.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by HockeySensible