: News Article:
New Arena deal agreed to by city and Katz group:mod warning #616
View Single Post
04-23-2013, 08:33 PM
Join Date: Apr 2005
Originally Posted by
The league can wet itself all it wants. It can't force Katz to sell cheap, and they can't force him to lose money playing in Rexall and they can't tell him to pay for the arena himself.
What prevents another move into Seatlle by another owner BEFORE Katz?
Why would Katz move to seattle in what is a far worse deal than what he's stated he requires here?
Given that the Seattle arrangement wasn't attractive, and wasn't very enticing to a prospective NHL club (and why would it be in that market) what other prospective markets would offer a better deal? Finally, which of those would be viable, and better hockey markets than this one.
Sure Katz COULD move. But why would he?
Hypotheticals are interesting. Katz leveraging in this regard is sublime comedy. " I'll move really I will, if only I could find a better place and better deal"...
Watching Katz stumbling with idle threats and apologies has been the best entertainment offered by this org in years.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Replacement*