View Single Post
04-23-2013, 10:06 PM
Registered User
Habsawce's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 28,785
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Ezpz View Post
I didn't say it was a good contract. I'm saying don't pretend like Subban got the short end of the stick and DD didn't because DD had to go through the same things Subban is going through.
Subban dominated the AHL and had a sensational rookie season and was our best defender last year. DD worked his way up through the ECHL and AHL and had a good first year in the NHL and got 4 years.

They're not even comparable in talent and ceiling, why does DD deserve 4 years when the team has 3 centres that are better and Subban gets haggled to a 2 year deal (essentially 1.5 year) when he's the best defender on the team?

Habsawce is offline   Reply With Quote