View Single Post
04-30-2013, 10:40 AM
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Monroe GA
Originally Posted by
The difference is Wilson still hasn't hit his prime while Vanek is in itand is closer to the decline. Then there is the cost factor. Wilson is far less expensive and will still be restricted when his contract is up. This is why Wilson should be kept over trying to trade him for Vanek.
The question is how good can Wilson be? Does he have the potential for 35-40 goal seasons?
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by NSHPreds1835