View Single Post
05-02-2013, 12:49 AM
Join Date: Feb 2003
Originally Posted by
He's effective precisely because he is used in a limited role, on a team with a ton of offensive weapons and depth. I don't see the purpose in moving a 40-45 pt guy in SK just to make room for a different 40 pt guy in Stalberg, especially at the increase in salary.
The reason you move SK is because he played like absolute crap this year, and in the 2nd half of 2012. Totally uninspired and just overall terrible. No reason to think that'll improve.
You will have a hard time convincing me that Staalberg who had more points is less ice time is a worse option. It's not like he played with Kane and Toews either.
Sk has to go, with or without Staalberg.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by dulzhok