View Single Post
05-04-2013, 09:56 PM
Sidgeni Malkby
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,156
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Rowdy Roddy Peeper View Post
The whole defense was terrible, and Orpik's been prone all year to doing the exact same things that you're criticizing Engelland for. Just like he was last year in the playoffs.

It would've helped nothing. But if you think it would have, against all evidence, more power to you.
Do you think Orpik is our #3, or #4 D?

Whatever number you feel he is....if a lower number was playing instead of him, then we played worse than we could have. That is measurable.

Would anything different have happened if Orpik had played? No way to prove either way.

Sidgeni Malkby is offline   Reply With Quote