View Single Post
05-08-2013, 06:53 AM
Registered User
flyersfan187's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Morrisdale, PA
Country: United States
Posts: 2,022
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to flyersfan187 Send a message via Skype™ to flyersfan187
Originally Posted by dats81 View Post
Pretty fair, unbiased assessment by flyersfan187.
I would agree on almost all the ratings.

It's almost impossible to come to a final decision on those players who have played only 10 games or less or who have been forced into bigger roles due to major injury woes.

While I liked how Huskins and Hall have filled in when given a chance, I can't tell if they really contributed that much or if they just joined at the right time when the season was already over and pressure had lowered and everybody startet to elevate their game...
Gervais should never have been in the lineup as a regular.

I was disappointed with Feds in general. He was solid defensively but a complete bust in terms of leadership and has turned into a non-factor even strength at this point of his career. Also, his great faceoff performance never translated from the KHL to the NHL.
Fedotenko is no better than a grade C on my list.
I may have rated Huskins so high because of how bad some of the other D's played this season at times.

flyersfan187 is offline   Reply With Quote