View Single Post
Old
01-02-2004, 09:22 PM
  #10
Strizzi
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Country: Switzerland
Posts: 3,069
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch
So your saying Sturm + a 1st and possibly even a 2nd round pick for Martin Havlat?? I'm sorry but that is extreme overpayment. I too think Sturm is the more complete player, but Havlat may very well have the highest trade value of the two. I could understand Sturm for Havlat and a 3rd, but a 1st and 2nd??? Thats way to much IMO. Like I said in my original post, I doubt this would ever happen (lets be honest what trade proposal here ever goes down), but I thought it was pretty close value wise, while still adressing team needs.
That's probably the point he wants to bring across: Sturm is much more valuable to the Sharks than to ANY other team, and therefore you'd have to seriously overpay. No value wise fair trades for Sturm at this point...

Strizzi is offline