View Single Post
05-11-2013, 02:50 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: West Kelowna, Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,030
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Big Phil View Post
Forsberg was a mere sophomore. It was his second season and he hadn't developed into the Forsberg we eventually knew in the postseason. He may have been on par with Kamensky that spring, let alone trying to compare him to Lemieux. Fedorov was a fine two-way player, no doubt, but if this is 1996 then he hasn't really turned into the playoff player we remember him to be at this point either (4 straight 20+ playoff point years, 3 Cups). Despite what both of them brought to the table in terms of all around play (which Forsberg was very early in his career with) there is no way anyone would pick one of them individually over Lemieux in 1996 to carry their team to victory. In 1996 we knew very well what Lemieux was capable of doing for a team in the postseason. He needed no introduction, and his regular season gave us no reason to think he wasn't capable of carrying a team anymore.
this is a perfect, unbiased post.

tombombadil is offline   Reply With Quote