View Single Post
05-12-2013, 11:08 AM
Registered User
dubplatepressure's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 8,027
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by ULF_55 View Post
So you'd rather have some poor skating, easily beat to the outside, penalty taking, get beat up in every fight defender?

They had one, and it was ugly.

I'll take the well rounded Gunnarsson over a one dimensional pylon everyday.
Please tell me in what world does the rejection of one endorse the polar opposite of another this place makes me chuckle sometimes.

Were we discussing the degree of efficacy his playing style has on our blueline I'd consider your comment relevant but as is, whether his role still suits or fills our needs is irrelevant when discussing the elements of his playing style (which is that of a soft, puck-moving defenseman), and NOT how good or bad that is for the team.

As a footnote, I too would take Gunnarson over a pylon, but is it even necessary to make these plainly obvious assertions?

dubplatepressure is offline