Thread: OT: Automobile Questions
View Single Post
05-13-2013, 12:35 PM
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 237
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Mrb1p View Post
The track point is wrong... The M is certainly ''easier'' to track, but the c63 has a lot more potential. I've raced quite a few M's over the year... They're fun, for sure but the C is a different beast!!!! The s4 is not even comparable, more of a flashy car. (Albeit I'd still own one )
What potential are you talking about? Stock for stock, the M3 absolutely ***** the
C63, and if you want to talk potential, throw a stage 3 Dinan Package and a 4.10 rear diff and there's nothing you can do to the C63 for it to keep up. Now is the C63 nicer as far as looks, perhaps, does it sound better for sure. If you have honestly raced M series before you would know that stock for stock there isnt much out there that touches BMW. BMW M cars is the benchmark for other manufacturers to follow, and that's exactly what they do is follow. Every year I go to the Tremblant race track and every manufacturer sends a couple cars and I can tell you nobody as the total package like BMW, sure some may look a little better, sound a little better, maybe brake a little better or have a little more power, but none of them have the total package like BMW M series cars. You said yourself the M is easier to track, have you never wondered why, that's where your answer lies my friend.

e46330ivs* is offline   Reply With Quote