View Single Post
05-13-2013, 02:43 PM
sactown dude
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 125
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by maruk14 View Post
But a sports league taking the unprecedented step of not only trying to force an owner to sell for a lesser amount by trying to claim eminent domain (essentially) over a business that has nothing tying it legally to that market isn't? Or a league going so far as to try and legally remove an owner using a "best interest of the league" defense (which has never been done, not even for Shinn) is somehow expected and normal?
I don't know how this will play out, I just know what one part of the end result will be: Kings in Sacramento. I guarantee they will not be moving to Seattle.

Everyone keeps acting like this is an A or B scenario, so if I say B isn't happening then I must be saying A will happen instead. But that's not true. I'm saying B won't happen, period.

Last edited by sactown dude: 05-13-2013 at 02:48 PM.
sactown dude is offline   Reply With Quote