Trade Rumours and Proposals Thread Part 17: What does "bold" mean?
View Single Post
05-14-2013, 10:24 PM
Join Date: Jan 2008
What a tough year to have a team need for d-men. I have a good feeling that any d-men is going to cost us a lot.
As I've posted before, my ideal lineup on D next year is:
Shattenkirk is UNLIKELY
Scuderi is UNLIKELY
Hainsey is a MAYBE
I really am stressing about the D next year, because it never gets fixed and I doubt it gets fixed again. Can anyone think of maybe TWO d-men to add that are realistic, and provide your case? You would be adding to this:
I'm thinking about more so getting D for picks/prospects/UFA rather than trading a body like Gagner/Hemsky, but if you feel that it's realistic that one of those two move for your guy, then present your case, though I'd rather see the above. Don't want to see someone say Klefbom is the answer, because I want him in OKC to start the year.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Paralyzer008