View Single Post
05-15-2013, 08:54 AM
Registered User
Fourier's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Waterloo Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 12,357
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by I am the Liquor View Post
One of the three high second round picks (basically first rounders) to actually turn into something useful?

Looks like a long shot at best.
You think it is a long shot that Lander plays in the NHL?

Of course you need to define useful. Take a look at this thread.

Notice that not one player drafted at #30 between 1999 to 2008 became a top six forward or top 4 dman. And if you look at the 50 players taken in the 26-30 slot over that period only ten reached that level.

So yes, the odds of a high second rounder turning into something better than Lander is a long shot at best.

Fourier is offline