New Arena Thread: Rogers Place? Yawn...
View Single Post
05-15-2013, 10:39 AM
Join Date: Apr 2005
Originally Posted by
Personally I don't agree with the City spending any money on advertising anywhere.
But given that they do, $2 M spent advertising at
what is essentially the City's window to the rest of the world makes sense
Well, the city owns the window, and the entire building it looks out of. Using your own quote why are they paying Katz for the window view? Because he promises to spray it with windex once/yr ?
Obviously what I'm stating is its mysterious for the city to have to pay an advertising fee on a building they own. One would infer that there could be some benefit of ownership..
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Replacement*