View Single Post
05-15-2013, 09:39 AM
Checked out
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hiking
Country: Canada
Posts: 48,856
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by worraps View Post
Personally I don't agree with the City spending any money on advertising anywhere.

But given that they do, $2 M spent advertising at what is essentially the City's window to the rest of the world makes sense.
Well, the city owns the window, and the entire building it looks out of. Using your own quote why are they paying Katz for the window view? Because he promises to spray it with windex once/yr ?

Obviously what I'm stating is its mysterious for the city to have to pay an advertising fee on a building they own. One would infer that there could be some benefit of ownership..

Replacement* is offline