View Single Post
Old
05-16-2013, 12:04 PM
  #21
joestevens29
Registered User
 
joestevens29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 25,399
vCash: 147
Quote:
Originally Posted by doubledown99 View Post
I read an article a few years ago that explained this occurrence really well.

It said that dmen take the longest to develop due to intricacies of position. It said that it was better to leave dmen in juniors/minors to learn and develop and also gain physical maturity.

The issue with 1st rd dmen busting so much was because they get rushed. GMs and coaches have short shelf lives so letting dmen develop properly isn't in the cards. Also fans now have more of a voice so they start to demand their high picks be in the lineup sooner rather than later. And if picks aren't its considered a failure on the teams part and puts the management jobs at risk.

So the dmen get pushed into the lineup to soon, lose confidence and end up busting. The article said with 2nd rd picks and later the same urgency an pressure wasn't there.

Just an interesting thought. Yes taking a dman early isn't bad. But will the team and fans have the patience to let him develop say for 2-5 years?
Other problem is waivers. You don't have that option to tell Zadarov he needs one more year in the, but at the end of the year we'll give you a chance so sign a two-way deal. Now if the guy has earned waiver eligibility he has earned it and you can't get around it.

Would Peckham have benefited from playing all year in OKC? Probably more than him sitting in the PB.

joestevens29 is offline   Reply With Quote