Thread: Player Discussion: Frolik
View Single Post
Old
05-17-2013, 02:36 PM
  #15
Sevanston
Moderator
 
Sevanston's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 10,724
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Double Dion View Post
Cool, that's kind of how I see him too. Valuable in the two-way game, paid a bit too much given his role. I'd obviously be hoping there is some offensive upside there given the depth in front of him in the Hawks organization. We have lots of NCAA prospects, the only one I wouldn't move for him is Gaudreau. That leaves Arnold (projects as a defensive forward with strong physical play, little offensive upside), Agostino (2nd/3rd line tweener with offensive upside), Ramage (bottom pairing physical guy, don't see him in the NHL honestly), Hanowski (3rd liners with scoring touch and physicality, kind of slow though) and Jon Gilles (probably the best goalie in college hockey right now). I'm not sure Gilles would be available straight up for Frolik, but I'd do any of the others or the 3rd round pick you guys thought was close.
I would take Bill Arnold for Frolik. Maybe add a late pick.

I loved Arnold's two-way play for BC this year. He also has good chemistry with K.Hayes.

Sevanston is offline   Reply With Quote