Eastern Semifinal: (1) Pittsburgh Penguins vs. (7) Ottawa Senators PT II
View Single Post
05-19-2013, 04:20 PM
Join Date: Mar 2013
Originally Posted by
He basically said we beat Montreal because they were completely off their game and that we are facing a deeper Pitts team which is why they should win in 4 games yet however we have played close games with Pitts with very poor play from our top 2 players. So if our top 2 players were playing like they were against Montreal, does that mean we were good? Or did we still win cause they sucked? Does it also mean if our top 2 players performed in games 1 and 2 Pitts wouldn't win in 4 and 5? Discrediting Ottawa and pimping Pitts when the games show otherwise. Logic makes absolutely no sense.
The games were close but Pittsburgh has been the better team and more importantly has won both games. Predicting a 4 or 5 game series doesn't necessarily mean every game will be 10-0.
Ottawas top players haven't been great but Pittsburgh has more offensive depth to beat Anderson with and to expose Karlsson's skating issues. I'm not saying Pittsburgh will win in 4 or 5, just that there isn't anything wrong with that prediction.
View Public Profile
Beau Knows's albums
Find More Posts by Beau Knows