View Single Post
Old
05-19-2013, 07:57 PM
  #213
TheDevilMadeMe
Registered User
 
TheDevilMadeMe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Brooklyn
Country: United States
Posts: 45,404
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by quoipourquoi View Post
Off-topic (isn't everything in this thread?), but it always rubs me the wrong way when you say this, Phil. The Avalanche didn't win the Stanley Cup when Forsberg was doing his "damage" from 1999-2002 because Sakic consistently came up short against Dallas and Detroit.

1999-2002
Forsberg vs. Dallas/Detroit: 32 GP, 14 G, 21 A, 35 PTS, +11
Sakic vs. Dallas/Detroit: 32 GP, 6 G, 11 A, 17 PTS, -8

Sakic can hang his hat on 1996, 1997, and 2001, but let's not lose sight of the fact that Sakic's lesser production against the two elite rival teams is the difference between the Avalanche advancing to the Stanley Cup or losing in the Western Conference playoffs in the years when Forsberg was the man.
Wasn't Sakic playing injured two of those years?

TheDevilMadeMe is offline   Reply With Quote