View Single Post
05-22-2013, 02:30 PM
Fighting Banana Slug
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 39
vCash: 500
As has been stated previously, the rankings only assess recent past performance, and as such Sweden/Finland would be rightfully rated highly. My problem, however, is the application of that ranking to the Olympics, where an entirely different caliber of players are available. Would anyone argue that Canada/US/Russia would be likely rated (relatively) higher based on the Olympic rosters?

Fighting Banana Slug is offline   Reply With Quote