View Single Post
05-27-2013, 02:17 PM
Registered User
bruyns's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Barrie
Posts: 330
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Smif View Post
Our enforcers played a big role in our regular season success, why would you take out Orr and replace him with Cooke especially when we already have Komarov? Also, we already have a Bickell, very similar to Kulemin. Gimme Clarkson instead, he's a better threat, can play on the 2nd PP in front if the net and will drop the mits.
Did they though?

Winning games and having enforcers dressed doesn't automatically mean we won for that reason. With that logic if we had a losing season with the same line up then obviously we should get rid of Orr and Mclaren right? Sometimes there is more to a player's value than just the team's record.

I find it silly and borderline offensive to attribute a big role in the team's success to our least used and worst players.

bruyns is offline   Reply With Quote