View Single Post
05-27-2013, 01:30 PM
Blueshirt Believer
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 6,063
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by NYRSchrute217 View Post
Which is reasonable. He's the best and deserves to get paid like it. Hopefully the numbers look like 8 years and 7M per. Henrik's quote is not very encouraging, but at the same time we should chalk it up to his frustration at another early exit.
Well the issue is would the Rangers be better off signing a goalie for 4 million and having the cap flexibility to bring in another forward?

Is it worth Hank's elite goaltending when you could possibly improve in other areas(significantly). I think there is a fair argument for both sides.

Hank is also a unique case, in the sense, that he is extremely marketable outside of his goaltending. That also plays a factor imo.

Blueshirt Believer is offline