View Single Post
Old
05-28-2013, 11:21 AM
  #221
NHRangerfan
enfoonts
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: New Hampshire
Country: United States
Posts: 3,091
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by -31- View Post
Well I would disagree that two seasons and 162 games is a small sample size, but the Rangers have been well above average over Lundqvist's term here.

http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/sh...php?p=63360207
Actualy it's only 129 games but not really a big deal, my point was I could pick 2 seasons from the Torts era that is in direct conflict with the OP's point.

09-10 Missed the playoffs...SO loss in Philly Game 82
10-11 Out in Round 1

Aside from last seasons #1 seed the team has mostly finished as a bottom seed when making the playoffs.

I'm not knocking Hank, and I certainly agree with the thread you included above, consistently turning over the roster creates no sense of cohesion or continuity.

My point which I think I included in another response about the last 2 seasons was, maybe 11-12 was the outlier season, the "Perfect Storm" if you will, and that this season the team has regressed to their norm...hard to tell based on a 48 game season, so I guess we'll need to see what next year brings.

NHRangerfan is offline   Reply With Quote