View Single Post
Old
05-28-2013, 03:43 PM
  #22
Greg02
Registered User
 
Greg02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,931
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crease View Post
I was waiting for this.

Is BPA truly the best strategy? I contend that in a salary-capped league where UFA age is 27, forwards should be given higher priority in the draft than defensemen.

Prime offensive years are generally between 22-28. Defensemen take longer to development, their primes are later, and they age better. In other words, its more cost-efficient to sign defensemen via free agency than it is to sign forwards.
It depends on what you get out of it.

The Rangers haven't had a shortage of NHL quality forwards. Rather, it's been the dearth of true gamebreaker forwards that was the issue.

While a forward will provide more prime years before UFA age, a better defenseman will be worth more for the years that he is playing. I'd rather have a second pairing defenseman than a second/third line tweener forward (in a vacuum). I'd rather have a first line forward more than both, but that really depends on whether you think you can hit the home run, doesn't it?

Greg02 is offline   Reply With Quote