The Carey Price Discussion Thread (Part 5)
View Single Post
05-29-2013, 02:15 PM
How about 76 for 25?
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Newmarket, Ontario
Originally Posted by
Ironic that you would crave balance and level headed arguments 2 sentences after making the most exaggerated hyperbolic statement of the thread.
As I have said before Price's regular seasons are not important any more, his abysmal post season record is the elephant in the room.
Just so you know, the statement of "Quick has had a better defensive team in front of him than Price has in front of him" is true.
The proof? Using the ranking system mentioned
, Los Angeles has had an approximately 5 point lower ranking than Montreal on average over the past 5 seasons, meaning defensively Los Angeles was better than Montreal over this time.
Don't fault Price's PO performance because the teams in front of him aren't of SC Contender material...
This year was probably his only "bad" year of all his time in the POs as the Canadiens #1. Look how amazing our depth was this year. A sure-tell sign that our team is a SC Contender...
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by dmanfish90