2013 NHL Entry Draft Talk 10.0
View Single Post
06-06-2013, 11:43 AM
Join Date: Jan 2013
Originally Posted by
It is possible... But why would we possibly want that? We want a quantity of quality picks, with this we would lose one to acquire none. If we move up, we give up a player. If we move down we better get good picks.
He told you why we'd want that - "20-50 is the place to be." There's a drop off after ~45, ~60 and ~75 IMO. If we move up, logic dictates (or my opinion anyways
) that we'd get a better player at 40-50 than at #55 and/or #115. It all depends on who's there. If guys like Bailey, De La Rose, Mccaron, Burakowsky, Lehkonen (players that have fallen) are in that #40-50 range, you've got to move up to select BPA if he's "your guy".
No way of knowing who will be where, no way to form a legitimate opinion.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Draft