Thread: Speculation: Trading Vanek
View Single Post
Old
06-08-2013, 04:16 PM
  #130
Zip15
Registered User
 
Zip15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 19,238
vCash: 67
Quote:
Originally Posted by Layne Staley View Post
I believe he was actually getting less ice time. Vanek was getting 20+ mins under Ruff at the beginning of the season ( and was scoring at the best pace of his career, go figure). When Rolston took over he was getting less and less. He was still getting more then he usually does so atleast Rolston had the sense not to give him 17 mins again.

There has been no reason for Vanek not to have been getting 18-20 mins a game and killing penalties from 07 on, ever since the co caps left. Ruff should have made him the primary forward and instead makes him a supporting piece. The first time Ruff put Vanek on the PK he had a shg in his first 2 games on the PK. He also successfully killed every PK he was on and the Sabres didn't allow a ppg in those 2 games. Of course Ruff takes Van off the pk for years Vaneks PK is extremely underrated as is his 2 way play. Vanek is a guy you can give 20 mins a game to and put him on the PK. Highly skilled players need to be on the ice period. Ruff ruined Vanek.

There was a season where Paul ****ing Gaustad had more ToI then Vanek Vanek was the most underused and wrongly utilized players in the whole league. He should have been getting 3 or more minutes a game then he was getting and no, saying Pominville needed to play with Hecht is not an excuse.
Thomas Vanek should not be on the PK. It was a dumb idea five years ago, and it's a dumb idea today. We have plenty of guys who can take shots off the shins and dump the puck down ice.

Zip15 is offline   Reply With Quote