View Single Post
06-08-2013, 11:17 PM
Registered User
Chief's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: NY, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 1,895
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by chosen View Post
Now that Boston has wasted Pittsburgh, isn't it apparent to most people that the reason the Rangers loss to the Bruins had nothing to do with their coach?

Is their anyone out there who believes that Rangers personnel is better than Pittsburgh, aside from goaltender?

The Rangers put up a much more competitive series than Pitt did. Yes, they only won one game, but Pitt looked totally overmatched. The Rangers didn't.
Toronto pushed Boston to the limit. Does that have a bearing on the Pens or Rangers? I don't think so but if you're looking for a conclusion, maybe it means that Randy Carlyle is a better coach than Torts or Bylsma. I'd agree with that.

Chief is offline   Reply With Quote