View Single Post
06-11-2013, 05:27 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 290
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by LeHabsMan View Post
I have seen both play. I know Dauphin was player of the game doesnt mean much although its always a good thing.

What does Poirier do that De la Rose doesnt? JDLR has more size, better hands, more grit and is a safer bet. He is an even better Poirier other than the fact that Poirier is from the Q.

Dauphin is different player all together.
I've also seen all three players play. De la Rose...good...Dauphin + Poirier are better!!!
De la Rose...doesn't have better hands than Poirier...he is certainly slower than Poirier...equally aggressive. I would choose Poirier...easily.
Regarding Dauphin...he has shown that he brings his A game...he outperformed other players placed in the same situation during the Prospects game and the -18 tournament.

phillytennis is offline