View Single Post
06-13-2013, 02:29 PM
with the 10th pick..
offdacrossbar's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: da cuse
Country: Tuvalu
Posts: 8,090
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Jonathan. View Post
Based on what? We had a couple of players that were good on the PP. You'd be hard-pressed to field two units. We could field one solid first unit, but have no depth on the 2nd (shocking that Sather's lack of foresight into secondary scoring would bite the team in the ass).
no jon we did have guys who could play. and you sure you want to blame just sather ? this was torts' team. he wanted this type of team. these were his guys.

we had gaby. perfect shooter but he was always on the wrong side of the ice making sure his shot was minimized. thats bad coaching.

we had zuk. perfect kinda creative passer for the pp. good with the puck and patient. a guy who has shown great ability in europe playing with the man advantage. he wasnt used properly. bad coaching.

we had beaver. good shot. good passer. smart. he was mishandled and misused. his 5 on 5 play was awful ill grant you that, but hes a guy who should be on every pp. he wasnt. bad coaching.

nash. he underperformed on the pp. you just gotta get him involved. bad coaching.

kreider. shoulda played more. he didnt. nuff said. bad coaching.

too much boyle. cally. pyatt on the pp for my liking. bad coaching.

too much del zotto. hes clueless mostly with the puck on the pp and his shot is abysmal. bad coaching.

while we dont/didnt have a true pp qb, we had guys who could have gotten the job done.

its coaching i tell ya....

offdacrossbar is offline   Reply With Quote