View Single Post
06-15-2013, 06:08 PM
Registered User
Skead's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,144
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by live playoff hockey View Post
A lot of revisionist history here

- The Sedins usually kill the last 15-30 second of the PP
-Weise never got an extended look on the second line.
- He put Schneider because he has been the better for 3 years now. CS also said that he was good to play
- Ballard is really bad, he only looked good for a short amount of time with Tanev. Rome played a mistake free game and was much better than KB4 when he was here
Hence why I said "full penalty". I understand they kill the last portion.
That being said they had 6-5, Sedin made a bad play to pass to burrows and it ended up in our net.

Why is Weise even getting a look on the 2nd line or with the Sedins in the first place? Build the confidence of Kassian or Higgins.

That's apart of being a coach, alright CS said he was good to go and had a terrible 3rd period which everyone (including Mr. AV himself) could see that CS looked awkward especially with lateral pad movement, that should have been the red flag noting that he wasn't 100%. What's the excuse for game 4? Management even wanted Luongo to play.

Again this has to do with confidence of working WITH a player. Ballard is NOT a "dump the puck in" type of player, he likes to free-wheel and make opportunities, which is exactly why we got him. KB4 was shoe-horned into playing a game he wasn't suited to play or face the consequence of being sat.

Skead is offline