View Single Post
Old
06-17-2013, 10:05 AM
  #48
Larry44
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,849
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by RJ8812 View Post
I disagree

for the most part, our ES lines are rolled with Lavy. You give Laughton the 4th line centerspot and PK time at the start and you go from there. He should be fine. That's what he was getting at the start of this season and he was getting between 9 and 15 minutes a night

Worked with Couturier
This is open to debate. Did it REALLY work with Coots? Everyone complains about his lack of offense. Part of it is role, part of it is because he was rushed.

Might he not have developed his offensive game even more in the Q, given one more year? Worked wonders for Huberdeau...

I'm not convinced Laughton NEEDS to play in the NHL this year. Another year in Jr as 1C (instead of 2C behing Jenner), a trip to the WJC as team leader, a playoff run, etc. might turn him from a two way checker to a scorer with more chance to blossom offensively.

Not saying he can't or won't play for the Flyers, but if you are developing offensive players for the future, playing 4th line minutes and doing PK work in the NHL might not be the only school possible.

Larry44 is offline   Reply With Quote