View Single Post
Old
06-19-2013, 12:37 PM
  #65
Lundsanity30
Registered User
 
Lundsanity30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 12,205
vCash: 500
Quote:
You're both incorrect. It is 100% is a financial decision. Not a hockey decision. I don't understand why it's so difficult to look past 1 season. The risk is nowhere near worth the reward.

Is Richards leading us to a cup next year?

Even if he comes in as a #1, and produces at a PPG clip, the long-term risk is far too devastating to consider.

And in case some of you guys are forgetting, this is a very physical game. Richards has lost his legs. His body is breaking down. You want to risk ****ing our organization for years and years, because Richards might play better?

Richards would be getting amnestied this summer even if he didn't have an abysmal year.
Henrik Lundqvist would def disagree with this. If he was a ppg player, the Rangers are a favorite lol

Lundsanity30 is offline