Ratings II: More 2013 NHL TV Ratings
View Single Post
06-21-2013, 09:47 PM
Join Date: Jun 2007
Originally Posted by
I guess Boston and Chicago aren't good hockey markets.
Because when the Bruins were an average run of the mill team (and even then the Bruins won the conference in 2002 and 2004) from 1993-2008 when they weren't a "forefront physical contender" they didn't draw in person or TV.
Chicago didn't do much in the late 90s to 2009. So you come off as either a Ranger hater or just some ignorant teenager because when the Rangers have been a contender, they've pushed the needle locally and nationally..
Hawks didn't even show home games on TV until starting in 2008 (Unless you call that joke PPV experiment Wirtz tried that lasted very briefly TV coverage)
So using ratings to judge Hawks fans during that era is a bit absurd
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Blackhawkswincup