View Single Post
06-26-2013, 08:12 AM
nyranger61494's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New York, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 3,896
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by NYR Viper View Post
I believe Chicago has (2) forwards on their roster below 6'0. Shaw, who plays much larger than he is, and Kane.
Agree on Shaw. I don't buy that Sharp is 6'0". Do guys like Frolik and Stalberg really use their size? I don't know. Just didn't seem like a team that was overly physical. The reason Chicago struggled in the early part of the series is, much like Pitt, they tried to play Boston's style of game--physical. Chicago is/was much more of a speed/skill team.

nyranger61494 is offline