View Single Post
06-27-2013, 02:56 PM
sepHF's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 12,393
vCash: 769
Originally Posted by KlimasLoveChild View Post
I would consider it debatable whether Visnovsky was ever a quality 1 or 2. To me Vis is like a d version of Gagner. Puts up the points but next to useless at doing most of the things considered mandatory to play position. You would clearly need a discerning eye and bring in a top 2 that fits the teams needs. A vis type d would be redundant on this team.
I thought Vis was very good while he was in Edmonton, he then went to Anaheim and led the entire NHL in scoring by a dman.

sepHF is offline