View Single Post
Old
06-28-2013, 07:39 PM
  #16
MS
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 14,862
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mayor Bee View Post
There's three facets to Vanbiesbrouck in the expansion draft.

First is that the Rangers had him and Mike Richter. For three or four years, they ran with this tandem and never made up their minds of who they were going to keep and who to trade. The second part of that is that, during the 1992-93 season especially, they never moved one for what would have undoubtedly been a sizable trade return.

Second is that Vancouver got him for "future considerations". This was understood to be directly tied to what the Canucks actually did with him. Letting him go to Florida cost them Doug Lidster. If they'd kept Vanbiesbrouck, it would have undoubtedly been a much more substantial package. Keep in mind this was under the old CBA, when awarding of players as compensation in free agency was still perfectly fine. A dispute between Vancouver and New York would have ended up on the new commissioner's desk, and who knows how that would have gone.

Third is that several teams had opportunities to get Vanbiesbrouck and apparently weren't offering enough. No one knows what those offers may have been, but it still circles right back around to New York not deciding between him and Richter at an earlier point.
I'm aware of all of this and don't disagree with any of it.

The fact remains that it was *insanity* that one of the NHL's best goalies, dead in the prime of his career, was only able to garner a #6-7 defender in his mid-30s.

Presumably, if any team had been willing to offer a #1 pick or any sort of decent roster player, NYR would have jumped at it. Because they basically ended up taking next-to-nothing.

MS is offline   Reply With Quote